weirdNano because I felt like it.

Dave McClure, I thoroughly disagree with you.

tl;dr - Some guy said some bullshit, then commented on an article about his statement. I saw that he responded, and thought it might be a prime opportunity to spout off. My reply: it's not a zero sum game, don't pretend like you're something bigger than you are... you're status and position of authority comes from wealth-power, not genius.

So, I saw this link @ google news and was terrifically bothered by the title:

Investor Dave McClure: ‘Open is for losers’

The article title refers to his response to a question roughly reiterated as: does openness in tech make sense? After reading the article, stewing and ranting at a friend of mine, I noticed that McClure had commented on the article. Seeing that there wasn't much response to his comment, I thought I might be able to make a connection to an opinion/decision maker... and hopefully make an impact.

Without further ado, here's my response copied from the link above, thought you guys might appreciate. Also, I'd be interested to know what people think of my position... does it hold water? am I missing something? am I on the right track? Or am I just a troll?

Response follows:

IMHO, cost is "borne by the climber alone" specifically because of the persistent closed tech meme perpetuated by those in positions of authority. Rather, it is the open nature of information that makes progress possible in the first place. Closed information is treated as 'property' in a way that minimizes the value of ingenuity. Imagine, for instance, that we awarded a patent the process of tying shoelaces, or wiping with toilet paper, or wearing hats, or agriculture, or brick making. Would that make sense? Not at all, instead we allow anybody to learn to tie their shoes so they can walk to work without their shoes falling off. Sure we do, and must, charge for the service of shoelace manufacture and delivery, but we don't prevent new companies from making stronger/lighter/skinnier/fatter shoelaces, improving on the original idea of a shoelace.

Consider the case of written language as an open technology: slave owners actively prevented their slaves from learning to read and write as a means of maintaining control of their 'property'. By maintaining ceaseless, often brutal, control of that property, slave owners were able to amass great wealth and privilege without lifting a finger to plant, tend, harvest, or deliver products to market... all they had to do was show up and put their face on the label. And of course, they had to perform horrible feats of what I would describe as meme-maintenance to maintain control and dominance of their property (e.g. 3/5ths type policies, lynching, institutional indoctrination, civil war, etc...).

Suppose people were forced to pay for the privilege read & write in our native tongue, would there be more or less 'winners'? I'd argue fewer. Case in point, let's search for examples of human achievement and general wellness in places that don't provide socialized education. Instead of being a resource-sink, an open technology seems to breed more, and more-complex, technologies. Open technology, in this case, is a beautiful, self-perpetuating sky-hook.

Open doesn't mean free of charge, it means freedom to examine, alter, improve and re-imagine. To fall back on my shoelace example, it would be outrageous to suggest that government policy should disallow the replication or redesign of shoelaces by all but the original inventor.

And to your 'bombastic' comment that "Open is for losers"... here's my equally bombastic response:

Closed is for those who think they could make it in this world alone. Closed is for the pompous, the self-important, and the arrogant. Closed is for those unwilling to admit that they are no longer 'working', but are fundamentally dependent on those 'losers' at the bottom. Closed breeds slaves and worse, slave owners.

From your bio (which I didn't read until after I wrote all of this, lucky guess I suppose): "Many years ago he used to do real work like coding or marketing or running conferences, but these days he mostly does useless stuff like sending lots of email, blogging, and hanging out on Facebook and Twitter."

http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/about-dave-mcclure.html

With respect to your human dignity,

@daveguy

p.s. Dave, if you want to reach out I would love the opportunity to respectfully cuss & discuss. I'm certain you would offer interesting insights.

Is this the Future of Google Wave Servers? I think so…

I'm a big fan of Google Wave, but I think it's really hard to imagine using in conjunction with e-mail.  And it seems to me that the chatty, e-maily features that you see in your browser might not be the really important future of Wave.  The UI is cool, don't get me wrong, and it shows off how flexible the system is for message relay between any number of collaborators... but what intrigues me is the underlying  server technology.

Beneath the UI, there is an open-source server technology that really makes me think about the future of the web.  The web that's steadily enveloping its users.  The Wave Federation Protocol is built on XMPP and designed to integrate easily and securely with other Wave servers, allowing information in a Wave to be shared easily with those permitted access.  Also, information changed in a wave is updated in nearly real-time (given a sufficiently fast server and connection).

Imagine a federated wave server running on hardware the size of your Nexus One? And your refrigerator.  And your car, washing machine, etc... Even your house.  All these information aware devices in your home communicating with your house, and each other, about: power consumption, maintenance needs, inventory (gas, cucumbers, toilet paper, water filters) and anything else that comes up.  All shared with the dashboard app on your Nexus One to remind you that it might be a good idea to turn off the A/C while the rates are high.  Or writing a grocery list on your slate computer, knowing what's in the refrigerator and whether it's gone bad. All of these devices working in unison doesn't necessarily need to be supported by Wave, but it seems like a possibility.  And all of these devices getting smarter and easier and more reliable, making your information rich environment that much more effective and efficient... for better or worse.

This guy knows what I'm talking about:

"What do we need? We need a really good webserver you can put in your pocket and plug in any place. In other words, it shouldn’t be any larger than the charger for your cell phone and you should be able to plug it in to any power jack in the world and any wire near it or sync it up to any wifi router that happens to be in its neighborhood. It should have a couple of USB ports that attach it to things. It should know how to bring itself up. It should know how to start its web server, how to collect all your stuff out of the social networking places where you’ve got it. It should know how to send an encrypted backup of everything to your friends’ servers. It should know how to microblog. It should know how to make some noise that’s like tweet but not going to infringe anybody’s trademark. In other words, it should know how to be you …oh excuse me I need to use a dangerous word - avatar - in a free net that works for you and keeps the logs. You can always tell what’s happening in your server and if anybody wants to know what’s happening in your server they can get a search warrant."

Eben Moglen -  Freedom In the Cloud: Software Freedom, Privacy, and Security for Web 2.0 and Cloud Computing

Fast Light

A lot of strange things have been going on in my life... a bit chaotic and jarring, I was happy to find myself  in a better place recently, mentally and such.  Anyway, here's what I wrote about it... let me know what you think.

Fast Light
Slow and soft and unexplained
this spark began its race.
Quick and fast it grew upon
the flesh that stayed in place.
Flashed on vines and bark and bones
it ripped and bit and tore.
Now dash and fly and scare away
before you fuel it more.
So fear and pain and blazing heat,
they nip upon your heels?
Better there than else, of course
you could become its meal.
Behind you now a forest burnt
but bodies breath within.
It's there, beneath the canopy,
that you will live again.
So turn to gaze and look inside,
and see the embers glow.
Their softened light presents a new,
and emptied space to grow.